<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So fresh and so clean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2004/11/so-fresh-and-so-clean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2004/11/so-fresh-and-so-clean/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=so-fresh-and-so-clean</link>
	<description>Camberwell and my life in it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Gooberman</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2004/11/so-fresh-and-so-clean/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Gooberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/?p=42#comment-371</guid>
		<description>I get you now Jamie and I agree with the gist of what you&#039;re saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get you now Jamie and I agree with the gist of what you’re saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2004/11/so-fresh-and-so-clean/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/?p=42#comment-344</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right I was being unfair on the dispensary. However, there&#039;s a difference between regeneration and gentrification. My point being that regenerating Crumberwell - i.e. providing jobs, cutting crime, cleaning the streets etc. is not a bad thing. The problem - and swanky bars are a good example of this - is that out goes the area and in comes yet another pizza express. BRB is bad enough, the developers who are looking to do the &quot;grave lane&quot; development seem to be in the gentrification game. Have you seen much affordable housing advertised on their website?

Decent blog though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re right I was being unfair on the dispensary. However, there’s a difference between regeneration and gentrification. My point being that regenerating Crumberwell — i.e. providing jobs, cutting crime, cleaning the streets etc. is not a bad thing. The problem — and swanky bars are a good example of this — is that out goes the area and in comes yet another pizza express. BRB is bad enough, the developers who are looking to do the “grave lane” development seem to be in the gentrification game. Have you seen much affordable housing advertised on their website?</p>
<p>Decent blog though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Gooberman</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2004/11/so-fresh-and-so-clean/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Gooberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/?p=42#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Woah there slick, the Dispensary is all right if that&#039;s your bag and if you think that Camberwell is not in need of some regeneration funds then you must be living in a different Camberwell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah there slick, the Dispensary is all right if that’s your bag and if you think that Camberwell is not in need of some regeneration funds then you must be living in a different Camberwell…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2004/11/so-fresh-and-so-clean/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/?p=42#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I disagree - Camberwell doesn&#039;t need tidying up just like it doesn&#039;t need shite bars like the dispensary. Grove lane development is truly worrying. Turning into bluddy Clapham if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree — Camberwell doesn’t need tidying up just like it doesn’t need shite bars like the dispensary. Grove lane development is truly worrying. Turning into bluddy Clapham if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CamberwellOnline Blog &#187; On redevelopment</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2004/11/so-fresh-and-so-clean/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>CamberwellOnline Blog &#187; On redevelopment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/?p=42#comment-355</guid>
		<description>[...] convenienced by this. 		  I want to address briefly* the comments made in my earlier post, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/index.php?p=42&quot;&gt;So fresh and so clean&lt;/a&gt;, about renewal in Camberwell. 		  Next year will mark 10 years since [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] convenienced by this. 		  I want to address briefly* the comments made in my earlier post, <a href="http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/index.php?p=42">So fresh and so clean</a>, about renewal in Camberwell. 		  Next year will mark 10 years since […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

