CamberwellOnline Blog

Camberwell and my life in it

Get regular updates

Subscribe to the RSS feed

Latest comments

  • Mumu: Regarding the church – I think we can learn from the experience of the Crystal Palace campaign, there is...
  • Liliana: @dagmar: funny you should be talking about local while im listening to a programme with reece shearsmith. i...
  • Dagmar: Kingsdale and Charter are good. The big gig tomorrow is the grand official opening of the new play area in...
  • Gabe: @Phil G — secondary school is an even bigger issue. “White-Flight” out to Beckenham or...
  • Liliana: re gala bingo hall – somebody mentioned how the planning officer in charge is on holiday – this...

flickr

  • Slave to the Burger?
  • FREE FRIDAYS 30.07.10
  • HH in da bar
  • This is a Public Information Announcement

RSS feeds:

Welcome to the Camberwell Online blog, a place for free and spirited exchange on anything with even a tangential connection to the South-East London district.

Still in my pyjamas

Published by Peter | Filed under General, Places

A very brief update, as I stayed at home for almost all of Christmas and so have very few Camberwell-related stories to tell.

First of all, as Ben Patio said in his comment, the Grove Lane development has been refused planning permission (in it’s current form) by Southwark Council. I don’t have the report to hand and I’m too lazy to look it up, but the essence of what they said is that it was just too ugly.

Camberwell has lost another of it’s great place names (after Bee’s Auto Bits) as the African restaurant, 4 Real We’re D Best, has been shut down by the bailiffs.

And that is all for now.

December 29th, 2004

2 Responses to “Still in my pyjamas”

  1. HAPPY NEW YEAR!

  2. ben patio says:

    statement on southwark website re grove lane development:
    “The proposal by reason of design, massing and general appearance, would adversely affect the character and appearance of this part of the Camberwell Grove Conservation Area, and would fail to either preserve or enhance that character and appearance. The proposed blocks have an overbearing appearance on the streetscene due to their size and poor design. The relationship of the size, siting, external appearance and scale of the blocks to the listed building is unacceptable.”

    there are two other reasons given as well: the vehicle entrance was proposed to be on camberwell grove rather than grove lane but no justification given for this;
    and the loss of two trees at the south end of the site.

    a good result for camberwell, i think. st george have a reputation as the lowest of the low, and when you’re talking about developers that is LOW.

Leave a Reply