<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A whole bunch of stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-whole-bunch-of-stuff</link>
	<description>Camberwell and my life in it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joby talbot</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-3240</link>
		<dc:creator>joby talbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-3240</guid>
		<description>I think Ganapati on Holly Grove is absolutely brilliant - I&#039;d go as far as to say it&#039;s the best Indian food I&#039;ve ever had. It&#039;s not your average curry house &amp; as such is more expensive than normal but not overpriced for what you get in my opinion. The Peckham Experiment on the other hand isn&#039;t much cop at all. They never have what you want &amp; the food varies enormously in quality. They don&#039;t deserve that lovely Tom Phillips mosaic at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ganapati on Holly Grove is absolutely brilliant — I’d go as far as to say it’s the best Indian food I’ve ever had. It’s not your average curry house &amp; as such is more expensive than normal but not overpriced for what you get in my opinion. The Peckham Experiment on the other hand isn’t much cop at all. They never have what you want &amp; the food varies enormously in quality. They don’t deserve that lovely Tom Phillips mosaic at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>hey people a quick response to the new dewaniam emails, this place is the best indian in south london , the people who think otherwise,well..... what can i say... you have no taste, and before someone say&#039;s that i work there WELL I DONT!!!! i just love the food and the people who run it, i think there great and have done a really good job , well done guys keep up the good work 
sam x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey people a quick response to the new dewaniam emails, this place is the best indian in south london , the people who think otherwise,well.…. what can i say… you have no taste, and before someone say’s that i work there WELL I DONT!!!! i just love the food and the people who run it, i think there great and have done a really good job , well done guys keep up the good work<br />
sam x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2923</guid>
		<description>I think there should be a &#039;New Dawaniam Anonymous&#039;,
Im a young &amp; very busy female who, for the want of a better expression is  culinaryley challenged!!!
I haven&#039;t been to new look restaurant, but what was wondering what the vibe was like....Before I relinquish my Take-away menu!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there should be a ‘New Dawaniam Anonymous’,<br />
Im a young &amp; very busy female who, for the want of a better expression is  culinaryley challenged!!!<br />
I haven’t been to new look restaurant, but what was wondering what the vibe was like.…Before I relinquish my Take-away menu!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>Come on, you MUST be New Dewaniam staff. What about that free meal, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, you MUST be New Dewaniam staff. What about that free meal, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>just wanted to make a quick comment about the new dewaniam, there food is really nice so is the staff, they have gone really big! there new resturant is very impressive, i dont know if they will do well as it is camberwell after all! but i wish the boys !! they havnt finished yet, they still got a lot of work to do, but when they have finished im sure they will do well, good luck guys keep up the good work
trevor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just wanted to make a quick comment about the new dewaniam, there food is really nice so is the staff, they have gone really big! there new resturant is very impressive, i dont know if they will do well as it is camberwell after all! but i wish the boys !! they havnt finished yet, they still got a lot of work to do, but when they have finished im sure they will do well, good luck guys keep up the good work<br />
trevor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben patio</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>ben patio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>The developers proposing the redevelopment of the Mary Datchelor site have submitted revised drawings to Southwark Council.  It&#039;s not much to write about - it seems they&#039;ve pretty much ignored the concerns of everyone, including the Camberwell Society.  They&#039;ve made a token reduction in the number of flats from 138 to 134 and there are some associated changes to the elevations.

Cynically, they&#039;ve made the changes just before the holiday period so that as few people as possible are around to formally object.  The new scheme still fails to meet the requirements of the Development Brief prepared by Southwark; it would demolish the fine 1926 building on Grove Lane; and (worst of all, as far as I am concerned) it is dressed up in an atrocious hotch-potch of faux-Georgian and neo-traditional architectural styles that will make a mockery of the fine buildings in the area.

Comments from the general public really do make a difference and are essential if Camberwell is to get the development it deserves on this site.  You can object by writing to Sonia Watson at planning.applications@southwark.gov.uk quoting application no. 05-AP-1695 - but make sure you do it by 27 December.

Oh - Happy Christmas everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The developers proposing the redevelopment of the Mary Datchelor site have submitted revised drawings to Southwark Council.  It’s not much to write about — it seems they’ve pretty much ignored the concerns of everyone, including the Camberwell Society.  They’ve made a token reduction in the number of flats from 138 to 134 and there are some associated changes to the elevations.</p>
<p>Cynically, they’ve made the changes just before the holiday period so that as few people as possible are around to formally object.  The new scheme still fails to meet the requirements of the Development Brief prepared by Southwark; it would demolish the fine 1926 building on Grove Lane; and (worst of all, as far as I am concerned) it is dressed up in an atrocious hotch-potch of faux-Georgian and neo-traditional architectural styles that will make a mockery of the fine buildings in the area.</p>
<p>Comments from the general public really do make a difference and are essential if Camberwell is to get the development it deserves on this site.  You can object by writing to Sonia Watson at <a href="mailto:planning.applications@southwark.gov.uk">planning.applications@southwark.gov.uk</a> quoting application no. 05-AP-1695 — but make sure you do it by 27 December.</p>
<p>Oh — Happy Christmas everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torie</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Torie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/blog/2005/12/a-whole-bunch-of-stuff/#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m guilty of bringing up the New Dewaniam, but I promise I don&#039;t work there! I actually went in last night and the new extension is a big improvement. The menu is the same but it was very quiet so I hope they haven&#039;t over extended themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I’m guilty of bringing up the New Dewaniam, but I promise I don’t work there! I actually went in last night and the new extension is a big improvement. The menu is the same but it was very quiet so I hope they haven’t over extended themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

