<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hello, hello, hello.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hello-hello-hello</link>
	<description>Camberwell and my life in it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:23:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagmar</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119696</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119696</guid>
		<description>The front garden of 238 Lordship Lane still has roses and sunflowers in it. The inhabitants must blink in disbelief from their windows, not just at the array of blooms, but at the growth in opulence of East Dulwich all around their prefab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front garden of 238 Lordship Lane still has roses and sunflowers in it. The inhabitants must blink in disbelief from their windows, not just at the array of blooms, but at the growth in opulence of East Dulwich all around their prefab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eusebiovic</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119626</link>
		<dc:creator>eusebiovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119626</guid>
		<description>I like Florence...she&#039;s yummy

That shimmering mane of red head gets me every time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Florence…she’s yummy</p>
<p>That shimmering mane of red head gets me every time…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oiy' you over there!!</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119625</link>
		<dc:creator>Oiy' you over there!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119625</guid>
		<description>Phil G says: &quot;Might’ve had to lie about my age, wear some skinny jeans, but that’s doable.&quot;

Skinny Jeans. Not with my legs Phil.  ooo no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil G says: “Might’ve had to lie about my age, wear some skinny jeans, but that’s doable.”</p>
<p>Skinny Jeans. Not with my legs Phil.  ooo no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil G</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119624</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119624</guid>
		<description>Labour got Ezzie Iddard but Dave has given that the smackdown with BONO.

Bored of Dave&#039;s speech already. Gonna look at flatscreen TVs instead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour got Ezzie Iddard but Dave has given that the smackdown with BONO.</p>
<p>Bored of Dave’s speech already. Gonna look at flatscreen TVs instead…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil G</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119623</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119623</guid>
		<description>FFS Bono! F--king Christ. Honestly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FFS Bono! F–king Christ. Honestly…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil G</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119622</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna start hanging round with the art students. I need to marry the next Florence &amp; the Machine to rescue me from this life of drudgery. Just imagine if I&#039;d been nicer to her when she was at the Dispensary. I could&#039;ve been so out of here. On tour around the world, partying, meeting groupies. Might&#039;ve had to lie about my age, wear some skinny jeans, but that&#039;s doable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m gonna start hanging round with the art students. I need to marry the next Florence &amp; the Machine to rescue me from this life of drudgery. Just imagine if I’d been nicer to her when she was at the Dispensary. I could’ve been so out of here. On tour around the world, partying, meeting groupies. Might’ve had to lie about my age, wear some skinny jeans, but that’s doable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oiy' you over there!!</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119621</link>
		<dc:creator>Oiy' you over there!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119621</guid>
		<description>Florian I have never been so insulted in all my life, mind you the day is young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florian I have never been so insulted in all my life, mind you the day is young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119620</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119620</guid>
		<description>Oiy
&quot;If it’s so unpleasant why do you read it?&quot;

So I can call dittohead blowhards like you out. 


Dagmar

I know why.  Did you know a) she was younger than Sally Thomsett in the RC; and b) she did Walkabout very very shortly afterwards?  I think she&#039;s lovely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oiy<br />
“If it’s so unpleasant why do you read it?”</p>
<p>So I can call dittohead blowhards like you out. </p>
<p>Dagmar</p>
<p>I know why.  Did you know a) she was younger than Sally Thomsett in the RC; and b) she did Walkabout very very shortly afterwards?  I think she’s lovely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil G</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119617</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119617</guid>
		<description>So thank God the postmen are rising up to protect the Royal Mail from &#039;modernisation&#039;, thus preserving the service for the great British public. While guaranteeing pay and jobs, of course.

Apparently Royal Mail managerial strategy is to slowly run itself into the ground. Seems a strange thing for a business team to want to do. What assets to strip? Melt the postboxes down?

Don&#039;t worry, the unions are going to run it into the ground a lot quicker instead.  I see they&#039;ve lost Amazon already. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So thank God the postmen are rising up to protect the Royal Mail from ‘modernisation’, thus preserving the service for the great British public. While guaranteeing pay and jobs, of course.</p>
<p>Apparently Royal Mail managerial strategy is to slowly run itself into the ground. Seems a strange thing for a business team to want to do. What assets to strip? Melt the postboxes down?</p>
<p>Don’t worry, the unions are going to run it into the ground a lot quicker instead.  I see they’ve lost Amazon already. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil G</title>
		<link>http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/2009/09/hello-hello-hello/#comment-119615</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camberwellonline.co.uk/?p=544#comment-119615</guid>
		<description>&quot;Gut it all over again&quot; Eh? What did they gut it fromt? The superb schools of Labour&#039;s 70s? Seems there was a functioning education system running quite well throughout the last Tory reign, when there was a fraction of the entrenched low attainment levels of today. &quot;NEETS&quot; soon to hit 1m.

Income disparity worse than ever after 12 years of Labour. I agree the Tories probably won&#039;t sort this, unfortunately, but Labour sure haven&#039;t.

Simple maths people. Real simple. Expenditure is greater than income, even without the bank bailouts everyone likes to blame. Since this imbalance is unsustainable in the longer run, cut expenditure or raise income (higher taxes).

If anyone is suggesting raising taxes significantly then fine, OK, but don&#039;t go on about the same kneejerk drivel about Tory cuts this Tory cuts that. Read the proposals. Some of the real medicine is from the LibDems. Are they the evil heartless ones now?

No, let&#039;s have NuLab idiots in again cos their heart must be in the right place and, despite the despicable levels of productivity gains in health and education spending in recent years, the fact that they are at least spending, albeit badly and randomly, must be good enough, at least they&#039;re doing the right thing. It&#039;s all the UK knows these days, borrow and spend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Gut it all over again” Eh? What did they gut it fromt? The superb schools of Labour’s 70s? Seems there was a functioning education system running quite well throughout the last Tory reign, when there was a fraction of the entrenched low attainment levels of today. “NEETS” soon to hit 1m.</p>
<p>Income disparity worse than ever after 12 years of Labour. I agree the Tories probably won’t sort this, unfortunately, but Labour sure haven’t.</p>
<p>Simple maths people. Real simple. Expenditure is greater than income, even without the bank bailouts everyone likes to blame. Since this imbalance is unsustainable in the longer run, cut expenditure or raise income (higher taxes).</p>
<p>If anyone is suggesting raising taxes significantly then fine, OK, but don’t go on about the same kneejerk drivel about Tory cuts this Tory cuts that. Read the proposals. Some of the real medicine is from the LibDems. Are they the evil heartless ones now?</p>
<p>No, let’s have NuLab idiots in again cos their heart must be in the right place and, despite the despicable levels of productivity gains in health and education spending in recent years, the fact that they are at least spending, albeit badly and randomly, must be good enough, at least they’re doing the right thing. It’s all the UK knows these days, borrow and spend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
